Login or Register
Biomedical Learning Institute Taught by the Experts
Thought Leaders
Biomedical Learning Institute
Please Note: The Oncology Learning Center has changed its name to Biomedical Learning Institute
Chair
Dr. Rosen

Steven T. Rosen, MD, FACP
Director, Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center
Northwestern University
Chicago, IL
 

CME CREDIT INFORMATION

Release Date: 08/19/10

Expiration Date: 08/19/11


Physicians: maximum of 8 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)

CME-Accredited Webcasts, Presentation and Audio Downloads, and i-Tunes Podcast Downloads
14 presentations, 3 case studies, and 1 Point-Counterpoint debate from the live course
First Annual Symposium on Personalized Therapies and Best Clinical Practices for Hematologic Malignancies
held in Arlington, VA on May 1, 2010

You may participate in any or all of the sessions for CME credit or a Certificate of Attendance after you review the required ACCME (Accreditation Council on Continuing Medical Education) information on this page.
Menu
Overview and Faculty Disclosures >> Sessions >> Evaluation & Certificate
Overview of This CME-Accredited Educational Activity

Your Options for Methods of Participation are:
  1. View and/or listen to any of the sessions (listed below) via an Adobe Flash Webcast
  2. Download any slides as Adobe Acrobat files
  3. Download any audio only as MP3s or Podcasts
  4. Request a DVD-ROM of all sessions

Sessions can be individually reviewed for credit. You can participate in as few or as many as you desire.

CME-Accredited Educational Activity Dates and Time to Complete
Date of release: August 19, 2010
Date expires (CME credit will not be avaliable): August 19, 2011
Average time to complete each individual session: 20 minutes
Time to complete entire activity: 8 hours
Overview

Taught by the top academic experts in hematology this is THE activity on hematologic malignancies that you should view in 2010. It contains the most up-to-date data from the recent December 2009 ASH meeting. The primary objective of the Personalized Therapies and Best Clinical Practices for Hematologic Malignancies Internet-based enduring materials is to provide hematologists, hematologist/oncologists and other physicians treating hematologic malignancies with the knowledge and competence enabling them to develop subsequent practice performance changes so that they can treat their hematology patients with the personalized approaches and best clinical practices in order to improve patient outcomes and minimize drug-induced toxicities.

Before the activity begins, a pre-activity educational assessment consisting of approximately eight patient care treatment-strategy questions with multiple-choice answers will be conducted to determine how you currently treat your patients in order to determine a baseline of current medical hematologists' practices.

Educational Needs Summary

NON-HODGKINS LYMPHOMAS
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) can be divided into aggressive and indolent types, and they can be formed from either B-cells or T-cells. In the US each year, nearly 54,000 people are diagnosed with NHL. It is the most common type of blood malignancy in the US.

FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA
Follicular lymphoma is an indolent form of NHL and comprises approximately 20 to 30 percent of NHL cases diagnosed in the US. For follicular lymphomas, once therapy is initiated, a rituximab-containing regimen has resulted in the highest rates of complete response and improvements in progression-free survival over chemotherapy alone. Currently, there are several chemotherapy strategies (single agent or combinations) that are used in the first-line setting. The role of radio-immunotherapy in the first-line setting is also area of interest in the treatment of follicular lymphoma. The treatment of relapsed disease is more challenging.

DIFFUSE LARGE B-CELL LYMPHOMA (DBLC)
DLBCL, accounts for approximately 30 percent of United States NHL cases. The mainstay of therapy for DLBCL is treatment with R-CHOP.

Currently, much of the clinical research conducted focuses on ways to induce high-quality responses and long duration of response. In an effort to further enhance the significant activity of R-CHOP as initial treatment of DLBCL, clinical trials are currently studying numerous new regimen combinations, which will be discussed in great detail in the symposium.

Treatment of relapsed or refractory DLBCL includes consideration of multiple high-dose, non-cross-resistant combination systemic therapy regimens with or without consolidation autologous stem cell transplantation (ACST). For example, the activity of lenalidomide in the treatment of relapsed or refractory aggressive NHL has been demonstrated in several clinical trials.

Standard treatment of relapsed or recurrent NHL has traditionally included autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplant for appropriate candidates, radio-immunotherapy or rituximab. In November 2008 the FDA approved bendamustine for the treatment of relapsed or refractory indolent lymphoma. Additionally, numerous other investigational agents are being evaluated.

CUTANEOUS T-CELL LYMPHOMA (CTCL)
The incidence of Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma (CTLC) is an estimated 1,500 new cases per year in the US versus 59,000 for all types of NHL. Treatment of CTCL depends upon the type and stage of the disease. Localized disease is usually treated topically with agents such as retinoids, nitrogen mustards or ultraviolet light.

Widespread CTLC disease is treated by any of a variety of agents. Bexarotene is one agent that is FDA approved for CTLC. Denileukin diftitox is another drug approved for treating CTCL. Vorinostat and romodepsin, both HDAC (histone deacetylase inhibitors) are FDA approved for treating CTCL.

PERIPHERAL T-CELL LYMPHOMA (PTCL)
Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) represent a l subgroup of non-Hodgkin lymphomas that historically, are difficult to diagnose. This subtype of lymphoma is also relatively uncommon with only a few thousand new patients diagnosed per year in the USA. Pralatraxate is currently the only drug approved by the FDA to treat PTLC. Investigational drugs used to treat this subtype of lymphoma include the HDAC inhibitors, bortezomib, and some bcl-2 inhibitors.

CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIA
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a lymphoid neoplasm in the family of the non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. It is the most common type of the four major types of leukemia and it accounts for one-third of all leukemias. About 15,490 new cases of CLL will be diagnosed in 2009 in the US. In 95 percent of people with CLL it is a B lymphocyte malignancy. It is estimated that nearly 90,000 people in the US are now living with or are in remission from CLL. This malignancy is more common in people who are 60 years and older than in younger adults. The number of people with CLL starts to increase after age 50. A small number of people are diagnosed with CLL in their 30s and 40s.

Patients who have intermediate- and higher-risk CLL are usually treated with combination chemotherapy and/or monoclonal antibody therapy. Such treatment is often an alkylating agent and/or a purine analog with either alemtuzumab, ofatumumab or rituximab.

MYELOID MALIGNANCIES
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML)
CML accounts for 15 percent of adult leukemias, and the median age of onset is 67 years. If left untreated, CML will progress from a chronic phase to a blast phase over approximately three to five years, leading to rapid disease progression and death. The hallmark of CML is the molecular presence of the Philadelphia chromosome.

The 2001 FDA approval of imatinib mesylate, a specific inhibitor of the bcr-abl tyrosine kinase, marked a revolutionary breakthrough in the management of CML, leading to durable major cytogenetic responses in 87 percent and complete cytogenetic responses in 76 percent of treated patients. Importantly, five-year overall survival exceeds 90 percent, with 84 percent of patients free of disease progression while continuing on treatment.

Some patients develop acquired resistance that may be related to mutations in bcr-abl and resultant conformational changes in the tyrosine kinase binding domain. Two next generation drugs are available to treat CML patients failing imatinib, dasatinib and nilotinib.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Acute myeloid leukemia is a rapidly progressing cancer of the blood and bone marrow characterized by an overgrowth of abnormal blood cells that quickly crowd out the healthy blood cells needed by the body. The NCI estimated that more than 13,000 patients would be diagnosed with AML in 2009, and nearly 9,000 deaths would occur as a result of the disease that same year. The average age of a patient with AML is 67 years old, with diagnoses very rarely occurring before the age of 40. Due to the fast-growing nature of AML, it is important for patients to be treated promptly upon diagnosis to minimize the risk of the disease progression. Induction chemotherapy, the standard front-line AML therapy, is associated with high toxicity, including bone marrow suppression and increased risk of infection, which often limits use in elderly patients with a poor prognosis.

Untreated AML is a uniformly fatal disease, and even with adequate therapy, the five-year survival rate among all risk groups combined is approximately 22 percent, diminishing to only 5 percent among those with poor-risk cytogenetics.

Despite our increasing understanding about the biology of AML, the prognosis is poor for the majority of the patients. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a curative option, however, only a small percentage of patients are candidates for this procedure. First-line treatment for AML includes induction chemotherapy with cytarabine and an anthracycline in an effort to reduce leukemic burden and induce disease remission, followed by consolidation strategies utilizing various doses and sequences of similar agents with or without stem cell transplantation.

For salvage therapy in patients who fail to achieve remission remaining options include allogeneic stem cell transplantation if a suitable matched donor can be found, and an FDA-approved therapy, gemtuzumab ozogamicin (an anti-CD33 antibody with evidence of activity in relapsed or refractory AML of the elderly) or enrollment into a clinical trial for treatment with an investigational agent.

Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)
The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are extremely heterogeneous in nature and may present with a variety of peripheral blood cytopenias. The transformation of MDS to AML is the ultimate disease complication leading to patient morbidity and mortality, with treatment goals of MDS focused on supportive care and reducing the risk of incipient progression to AML.

MDS are diagnosed in slightly more than 10,000 people in the United States yearly for an annual age-adjusted incidence of 3.4/100,000 people. The vast majority of low- and moderate-risk patients are initially managed with low intensity chemotherapy. Those with higher-risk disease may be managed with induction chemotherapy, similar to regimens utilized in AML, or preferably with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant if a donor is available. Both azacitadine and decitabine are approved by the FDA for treating MDS in all risk subsets, but azacitadine is the only agent of the two currently administered in the outpatient setting that has recently demonstrated improved overall survival versus standard care, even in patients with higher-risk disease.

MULTIPLE MYELOMA
Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell neoplasm that accounts for approximately 10 percent of all hematologic malignancies. The utility of lenalidomide or bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone and other agents has traditionally lead to substantial rates of objective and complete response, as well as subsequent successful ASCT.

In the setting of poor ASCT candidates, induction chemotherapy frequently includes the well-studied alkylating agent melphalan with steroids and/or thalidomide. However, as in the context of planned ASCT, the newer agents lenalidomide and bortezomib are now used in the front-line setting.

Relapsed or refractory myeloma is considered a salvage situation, and acceptable regimens in this setting include monotherapy and various combinations with the following lenalidomide, dexamethasone, bortezomib, vorinostat, thalidomide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin.

The following is list of all sessions

Session 1: Critical Questions in the Treatment of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma, Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Chair: Thomas Witzig
1a.
Follicular Lymphoma – Initial Therapy May 2010
Thomas Witzig
1b.
Point-CounterPoint: Maintenance therapy with an anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody rather than re-treatment upon relapse is the optimal strategy for patients with follicular lymphoma who have undergone first-line therapy.
Pro: Julie Vose
Con: Jane Winter
1c.
Case Study: A patient with relapsed follicular lymphoma. A case study followed by a review of the appropriate therapeutic options after initial systemic therapy, including traditional and new therapies and stem cell transplant.
Andrew Zelenetz
1d.
Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Progress in the frontline setting...
André Goy
1e.
Case Study: The treatment of relapsed mantle cell lymphoma: applying the results of the newest clinical trials. A case study followed by a review of the appropriate therapeutic options after initial systemic therapy, including traditional and new therapies.
Anas Younes
1f.
How do we select the optimal strategies for the treatment of newly diagnosed and also for treating relapsed or refractory patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)?
Andrew Evens
1g.
Current and Emerging Therapies Treatment of Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma (PTLC) and Related Disorders.
Julie Vose
1h.
State-of-the Art Therapy for Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL)
Madeleine Duvic
1i.
Optimal clinical applications of chemotherapies and targeted therapies in the first-line setting of CLL.
Bruce Cheson
1j.
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Salvage Therapy 2010.
Tait Shanafelt
Session 2: Critical Questions in the Treatment of Myeloid Malignancies: Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Chair: Michael Deininger
2a.
Treating AML: How do we integrate prognostic factors into optimal treatment decision making?
Richard Larson
2b.
Evolving Treatment Strategies in APL.
Jessica Altman
2c.
How to choose the optimal initial therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia.
Michael Deininger
2d.
Case Study: Your CML patient has relapsed after first-line systemic therapy. What are the next therapeutic options? A case study followed by a review of the results of the latest clinical trials evaluating the various traditional or emerging systemic treatment options for patients with relapsed or refractory CML.
Moshe Talpaz
2e.
Myelodysplastic syndromes: How do we apply the latest clinical data in patient care?
Steven Gore
2f.
Additional Case Studies from audience
Richard Larson and Steven Gore
Session 3: Critical Questions in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma
Chair: S. Vincent Rajkumar
3a.
What are the optimal treatment strategies for transplant eligible candidates with multiple myeloma?
Nikhil Munshi
3b.
Treatment of myeloma: non-transplant candidates.
S. Vincent Rajkumar
Educational Objectives

At the conclusion of all of these enduring materials, you should be able to:
  1. Determine how cytogenetics, molecular biomarkers and other predictive or prognostic factors can be integrated into the decision-making process for choosing the optimal therapies for patients with hematologic malignancies.
  2. Develop therapeutic algorithms for the clinical management of indolent NHL and CLL, addressing benefit to risk considerations in the selection of treatment strategies.
  3. Because the goal of therapy for DLBCL is often curative, define a personalized approach to the treatment with DLBCL to increase the quality and durability of response and devise treatment strategies to improve clinical outcome in patients who have relapsed after initial treatment.
  4. Evaluate current treatment options for patients with CML and determine the optimum personalized approach to treatment selection based on the latest clinical evidence.
  5. Determine how biomarkers and cytogenetics can be optimally utilized in the monitoring of CML patients and determine when second-line therapy should be initiated to optimize clinical outcome.
  6. Devise a treatment strategy for AML based on the individual characteristics of the patient, integrating supportive care with therapeutics to optimize patient outcome.
  7. Explain how the heterogeneous manifestations of MDS and the associated cytogenetic markers impact therapy choice among low-intensity chemotherapy, biologic response modifiers, and molecular targeted agents in specific patient populations, and apply this information to clinical decision-making.
  8. With several effective treatment options currently available, select the optimal personalized strategy for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma based on the latest clinical data.
  9. Counsel appropriately selected patients on the availability of clinical research studies offering novel treatment approaches in the management of hematologic malignancies.
Target Audience

Hematologists, hematologist/oncologists, radiation oncologists, pathologists and medical oncologists who are involved in the treatment and/or management of patients with hematologic malignancies. Fellows, Physician Assistants, Nurse Practitioners, oncology nurses, pharmacists and other health care professionals involved in the treatment and care of patients with hematologic malignancies including primary healthcare providers treating patients with hematologic malignancies, and also Managed Care Directors, Medical Directors, and/or Case Managers. These malignancies are treated optimally by a multi-disciplinary approach of clinicians and, thus, they are all targeted for invitation to these educational activities.
CME Accreditation & Credit Designation

The Oncology Learning Center is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

The Oncology Learning Center designates this educational activity for a maximum of 8 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

CME Certificate or Certificate of Participation

The relevant section(s) of the Evaluation Form pertaining to the session(s) of the enduring materials you have viewed or listened to, and the Request for Credit Form must be completed and submitted to the Oncology Learning Center following your participation in the enduring material educational activity to obtain CME credit. Physicians and other participants will be able to print their certificates after they complete these Forms.
Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest

In accordance with the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) Standards for Commercial Support, educational programs sponsored by the Oncology Learning Center must demonstrate balance, independence, objectivity, and scientific rigor. All faculty, authors, editors, and planning committee members participating in an OLC-sponsored activity are required to disclose any relevant financial interest or other relationship with the manufacturer(s) of any commercial product(s) and/or provider(s) of commercial services that are discussed in an educational activity.
Faculty Disclosures

It is the policy of the Oncology Learning Center, Inc. (OLC) to ensure that all of its educational activities and materials are of the highest quality, and are balanced, objective, independent, free of commercial bias, and planned and developed with scientific rigor with strict adherence to all Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) rules and policies. The OLC evaluates all content, faculty and faculty disclosures for any potential conflicts of interest. Should any conflicts of interest be identified these conflicts are resolved in advance of the educational activity by independent peer reviewers who are experts in the subjects of the educational activity.

All faculty and OLC staff participating in the content, planning or implementation of an educational CME activity are required to disclose to the audience of the educational activity any relevant financial relationships or interests and to assist in the resolution of any conflict of interest that may arise from the relationship(s) or interest(s). It is also the policy of the OLC to require all faculty presenters to make a meaningful disclosure to the audience of their discussions of unlabeled or FDA unapproved drugs, products, tests or devices. This information will be available as part of the educational activity and related material.

The following faculty and OLC staff have reported real or potential relevant conflicts of interest and these conflicts have been resolved, prior to this educational activity through a peer-review process by two medical oncologists who have had no affiliation with this educational activity other than the peer review process.  This is documented on this page immediately following the financial disclosures below.

Jessica K. Altman, MD
Fees for Non-CME Services Received Directly from Commercial Interest: Eisai
Bruce D. Cheson, MD
Consultant: Cephalon, Genentech, Roche, Celgene
I intend to reference unlabeled/unapproved uses of drugs or products in my presentation.
Michael Deininger, MD, PhD
Consultant: Novartis Oncology, BMS
Funded Research: Calistoga Pharmaceuticals, SGX Pharmaceuticals
Speaker's Bureau: BMS
Madeleine Duvic, MD
Contracted Research: Allos, BioCryst, Kowa Hakko Kirin Pharma, Celgene, Curagen, Cyclacel, Dermatex, Eisai, Lilly, Genmab, HanaBiosciences, Hoffmann-LaRoche, Memorial Sloan-Kettering, Merck, Novartis, Ortho Biotech, Scott & White, Therakos, Topo Target, Yaupon
Andrew Evens, MD
Consultant: Millennium, Ziopharm, Seattle Genentics
Fees for Non-CME Services Received Directly from Commercial Interest: Spectrum Pharmaceuticals
Contracted Research: Millennium, Ortho-Biotec, Pharmacyclics, Ziopharm, Lilly
I intend to reference unlabeled/unapproved uses of drugs or products in my presentation.
Steven D. Gore, MD
Contracted Research: Celgene, Johnson & Johnson
Ownership Interest: Celgene
I intend to reference unlabeled/unapproved uses of drugs or products in my presentation.
André Goy, MD, MS
Consultant: Celgene, Genentech, Millennium, Allos
I have no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report.
Richard A. Larson, MD
Consultant: Novartis, GSK, Hana Bioscience, Antisoma, Spectrum, Caremark/CVS, Celgene, Eisai, Trubion, Millennium
Contracted Research: Amgen, Novartis, BMS, Genentech, Celgene
Ownership Interest: GSK, Medco Health Solutions, Merck
I intend to reference unlabeled/unapproved uses of drugs or products in my presentation.
Nikhil C. Munshi, MD
Consultant: Celgene, Millennium, Novartis
I intend to reference unlabeled/unapproved uses of drugs or products in my presentation.
S. Vincent Rajkumar, MD
I have no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report.
I intend to reference unlabeled/unapproved uses of drugs or products in my presentation.
Steven T. Rosen, MD, FACP
Consultant: Abbott Laboratories, Allos, Berlex, Biocryst, Celgene, Cephalon, CTI, Genentech, Genta, Ligand, Lilly, Pharmion, Sigma-Tau, Supergen, Therakos, Trubion Pharmaceuticals, Wyeth
Fees for Non-CME Services Received Directly from Commercial Interest: Berlex, Celgene, Wyeth, Merck
Tait D. Shanafelt, MD
Contracted Research: Genentech, Cephalon, Celgene, Polyphenon E International, Hospira
I intend to reference unlabeled/unapproved uses of drugs or products in my presentation.
Moshe Talpaz, MD
Consultant: Novartis, BMS
Fees for Non-CME Services Received Directly from Commercial Interest: Novartis, BMS
Julie M. Vose, MD
Contracted Research: Allos Therapeutics, Astellas, BMS, Celgene, Genentech, Genzyme, GSK, Millennium, Novartis, Pharmacyclics, Rigel
I have no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report.
Jane N. Winter, MD
Consultant: Novartis, Hana Bioscience, Antisoma, Caremark
Fees for Non-CME Services Received Directly from Commercial Interest: Spectrum
Ownership Interest: BMS, GSK, Medco Health Systems, Merck
I intend to reference unlabeled/unapproved uses of drugs or products in my presentation.
Thomas E. Witzig, MD
Consultant: Celgene, CTI, Spectrum, Novartis
I intend to reference unlabeled/unapproved uses of drugs or products in my presentation.
Anas Younes, MD
Consultant: Bohringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Sandoz, Trublon, Amgen, Abbott Oncology, Genentech, Biogen Idec, Seattle Genetics, Methylgene, Pharmion, Sanofi-Aventis, Xencer, Tibe Oncology, Allos Therapeutics, Syndox, Italfarmoso, GSK
I have no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report.
Andrew D. Zelenetz, MD, PhD
Consultant: Celgene, CTI, GSK, Cephalon, Genentech
Contracted Research: Amgen, GSK, Genentech
Oncology Learning Center staff
We have no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report.
Faculty Affiliations

Jessica K. Altman, MD
Division of Hematology/Oncology
Northwestern University
Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center
Chicago, IL

  S. Vincent Rajkumar, MD
Professor of Medicine
Division of Hematology
Department of Medicine
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, MN

Bruce D. Cheson, MD
Professor of Medicine
Hematology/Oncology
Head of Hematology
Director, Hematology Research
Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center
Georgetown University Hospital
Washington, DC

  Steven T. Rosen, MD, FACP (Chair)
Director, Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center
Northwestern University
Chicago, IL

Michael Deininger, MD, PhD
Professor of Medicine
Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology
Section Head, Center for Hematologic Malignancies
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, OR

  Tait D. Shanafelt, MD
Associate Professor of Medicine
Division of Hematology
Department of Medicine
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, MN

Madeleine Duvic, MD
Deputy Department Chair
Department of Dermatology
Professor of Medicine and Dermatology
Division of Internal Medicine
The University of Texas
M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX
  Moshe Talpaz, MD
Professor, Department of Internal Medicine
Alexander J. Trotman Professor of
Leukemia Research
Associate Director of Translational Research
Associate Chief/Director of
Hematologic Malignancies
University of Michigan
Comprehensive Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, MI

Andrew Evens, MD
Division of Hematology/Oncology
Northwestern University
Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center
Chicago, IL

  Julie M. Vose, MD
Neumann M. and Mildred E. Harris Professor
Chief, Section of Hematology/Oncology
Professor of Medicine
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, NE

Steven D. Gore, MD
Professor of Hematology/Oncology
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, MD

  Jane N. Winter, MD
Professor of Medicine
Division of Hematology/Oncology
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center
of Northwestern University
Chicago, IL

André Goy, MD, MS
Chief, Lymphoma Division
The Cancer Center Hackensack University
Medical Center
Hackensack, NJ

  Thomas E. Witzig, MD
Professor of Medicine
Division of Hematology
Department of Internal Medicine
Mayo Clinic
College of Medicine
Rochester, MN

Richard A. Larson, MD
Professor of Medicine
Director of Hematologic Malignancies Clinical
Research Program
The University of Chicago Medical Center
Chicago, IL

  Anas Younes, MD
Director, Clinical and Translational Research Program
Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma
Division of Cancer Medicine
The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX

Nikhil C. Munshi, MD
Associate Professor of Medicine
Harvard Medical School
Jerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, MA

  Andrew D. Zelenetz, MD, PhD
Chief, Lymphoma Service
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
New York, NY

Peer Review Process of Conflicts of Interest

This educational activity has been independently peer-reviewed.
Disclosure of Unlabeled Uses

This educational activity may contain discussion of published and/or investigational uses of agents that are not indicated by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). For additional information about approved uses, including approved indications, contraindications, and warnings, please refer to the prescribing information for each product or consult the Physicians' Desk Reference.

The Oncology Learning Center (OLC) does not recommend the use of any agent outside of the FDA labeled indications. The opinions expressed in the educational activity are those of the faculty and do not necessarily represent the views of the OLC. Please refer to the official FDA prescribing information for each product for discussion of approved indicated, contraindications, and warnings.

Acknowledgement of Supporters

Educational Grants

Sincere appreciation is extended to the following companies for their generous support of this educational meeting:

Genentech
Novartis
Celgene
Eisai
Allos Therapeutics
Spectrum Pharmaceuticals
Genzyme
Seattle Genetics
OBR
I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTOOD THE FACULTY DISCLOSURES
Please check the box above before you click the button below.
© 2012 Biomedical Learning Institute
1415 Legacy Drive, Suite 250 • Frisco, TX 75034 • Registration Phone: 214.269.2014 • Fax: 214.866.0311
Contact Us
Disclaimer: The material published on the Biomedical Learning Institute(BLI) Web site reflects the opinions and expertise of the authors and/or reviewers of the material, and not the opinions of the BLI, the CME provider, or the commercial supporters providing educational grants. The materials may address uses and dosages for therapeutic products that have not been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Before using any therapeutic approaches reviewed in this material, a qualified physician should be consulted. Readers of this content should verify all information and data before treating patients or using any drugs or therapies described in any BLI materials. Click here for our Privacy Policy.